drugs Essays (544 words) - Substance Abuse, Psychiatric Diagnosis

RA 9165 or Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 approved on January 23, 2002, is an act instituting the comprehensive Dangerous Drug Act of 2002.It establishes the Dangerous Drugs Board, which is the policy-making and strategy-formulating body in the planning and formulation of policies and programs on drug prevention and control. Dangerous Drugs Board is a Philippine government agency that makes policies, strategies and programs on drug prevention and control. Drug is any substance that the body of a living organism absorbs, that alters normal bodily function. Prescribed drugs, Regulated Drugs, Prohibited Drugs are three classifications of drugs. Prescribed drugs are a licensed medicine that is regulated by legislation to require a prescription before it can be obtained. Regulated Drugs are specific drugs that are controlled by the Food and Drug Association. Lastly, Prohibited drugs are drugs that are prohibited by the government to use. Different examples of prohibited drugs are Marijuana, Opium, Methamphetamine and Shabu. These kinds of drugs can lead to addiction or drug abuse. There are so many bad effects this taking these drugs; one of this is addiction, which will lead you in making your life miserable. Environment, peer pressure, individual problems and depression are the factors that lead younger generation today in taking these prohibited drugs. Drug used is the increasing problem among teenagers in today's high schools. Most drug use begins in the preteen and teenage years, these years most crucial in the maturation process. Drugs are readily, adolescents are curious and venerable, and there is peer pressure to experiment, and there us a temptation to escape from conflicts. The use of drugs by teenagers is the result of a combination of factors such as peer pressure, curiosity, and availability. Drugs addiction among adolescents in turn leads to depression and suicide. One of the most important reasons of teenage drug usage is peer pressure. Peer pressure represents social influences that effect adolescents; it can have a positive or a negative effect. These may include depression fatigue, withdrawal symptoms and even physical accidents. Drug addiction leads to poor work performance and destructs family life in the society the cost of drug abuse is very high. It reduces work efficiency and productivity due to absenteeism in work. Many road accidents are caused by drug addicts who put their lives and those around them in danger. Neighborhoods with drug activities are involved in drug related violence and crimes, which disrupt peaceful neighborhoods. Many jobless and homeless people in the community are either drug addicts or mentally unstable. The problems of teenage drug use, depression and suicide are evident in our society. These are very real and threatening issues that have to be dealt with. Going into the 21st century we have to face to problems of our future generations. There are many non-profitable organizations that help teenagers to cope with drug use. There are help lines, community services that offer information about drugs, and individual counseling is available almost in every education institution. There is help available to those who seek it. Would we ever be able to live in a drug free environment? Could we ever educate our future generations so those drug problems would be non-existent? Hopefully the answer is yes.

How does cognitive theory explain the aetiology of depression Essay Example

How does cognitive theory explain the aetiology of depression Essay Example How does cognitive theory explain the aetiology of depression Essay How does cognitive theory explain the aetiology of depression Essay In this essay, the symptoms of depression will be described and aetiology discussed from a cognitive viewpoint. In particular, Seligmans learned helplessness (1975); Abramsons (1978) revision of learned helplessness; Becks cognitive distortion model (1976), and Teasdales differential activation hypothesis (1988) shall be evaluated. Cognitive theorists generally regard thought processes as causative factors in depression. The treatment of depression proposed by cognitive theorists will also be assessed in detail, and empirical evidence shall be considered. Finally, a conclusion of the efficacy of cognitive theory regarding depression shall be presented and suggestions offered regarding the direction in which research should go in the future. Many psychologists and psychiatrists alike have described the symptoms of depression; however, one description is particularly apt. Mood is sometimes dominated by a profound inward dejection and gloomy hopelessness, sometimes more by indefinite anxiety and restlessness. The patients heart is heavy, nothing can permanently rouse his interest, nothing gives him pleasure . . . Kraeplin (1921, p. 6). Depression is termed an affective mood disorder due to the foremost feature of abnormally low mood. Depression occurs when feelings of sadness or grief are prolonged and exaggerated beyond what seems reasonable. Depression therefore ceases to be a symptom and becomes an illness, involving widespread depression of mental and physical functions. The patient appears slow and indecisive, increasingly unable to cope with everyday problems. Physical symptoms are often prominent because bodily functions are upset and because depression lowers the tolerance for discomfort and pain. Seligman (1975) describes depression as the common cold of psychiatry because it is also so widespread. Following the cognitive revolution in the 1960s, theorists began to use cognitive theories to explain affective disorders. Cognitive theories are mainly based on unipolar rather than bipolar depression, which is believed to have an entirely different aetiology. Therefore unipolar depression shall be only investigated in this paper. Stated simply, cognitive therapy is based on the assumption that negative cognition distortion of experience underlies depression. This approach shall be analysed in consideration of Aaron Beck (1974) and additions by others, including Teasdale (1988) and Seligman (1975). Seligmans original learned helplessness theory (1975) was based on the experimental examination of two groups of dogs. The experimental group were given unavoidable electric shocks repeatedly, while the control group were given the same shocks but with the option of escaping them. The experimental group demonstrated what Seligman described as learned helplessness. This was characterised by lethargy, sluggishness, and loss of appetite. Seligman theorised that this phenomenon was a result of a perceived lack of control, and he generalised it into a theory of human clinical depression. He proposed that if you expose a person to a stressor and they perceive no control over it, they will respond with learned helplessness. Criticisms of Seligmans theory include: is it really possible to generalise from a sample of one species of animal to humans? And why do some people deal with stressors well and others poorly? Clearly Seligmans theory is inadequate because it fails to explain individual differences. Abramson (1978) revised the learned helplessness theory in an attempt to deal with the individual differences criticism. In order to do this, he introduced attributional styles into the theory. The four basic premises are displayed in Table 1. Expected aversiveness (Expecting that highly aversive outcomes are probable) Expected uncontrollability (Expecting that you will be unable to control situations) Attributional style Internal bad events caused by self rather than external sources Stable the source of a bad event is stable and will therefore happen again Global the repercussions of a bad event are far reaching (Maladaptive, so negative events are attributed to having internal, stable or global characteristics) Severity of symptoms (The more certain an aversive state of affairs is, the greater the resultant cognitive and motivational deficits) Table 1 basic premises of Abramsons (1978) revision of learned helplessness Criticisms of Seligman (1975) and Abramson (1978) tend to centre on the idea that the theory is simply too basic. It needs a richer framework and it needs to explain how structures and processes are organised. Seligman fails to even attempt this, however sis repertoire was within the animal field and not human beings, and the latter are more complex in certain faculties. The previous theories also ignore the consequences of peoples actions and the moral aspects of their thoughts. Seligman sees attributional style as a stable trait. Whilst, clinical observation of depressives shows that attributional style fluctuates with mood state. Studies of non-depressives and recovered depressives show no differences in their attributional style. Additionally, learned helplessness has been shown to be non-predictive. In a longitudinal study, Lewinsohn (1981/1988) found that dysfunctional attitudes/belief sets do not predict depressive symptoms in a 4 month follow up of college students. Therefore stable, maladaptive cognitions were not found to be vulnerability factors, thus contradicting the theory. In other words, learned helplessness is a descriptive account of depression as opposed to an aetiological explanation (Lewinsohn, 1981). Clearly, the aforementioned theories have been insufficient as causal theories of depression. Research has focused uttermost on Becks (1976) cognitive theory of depression. He devised a schema-based model of depression, aiming to provide a coherent account of the beliefs a depressed person expresses about themselves, the future and the world. To outline his model: Previous negative events are encoded in the form of schemas. Beck defined schemas as relatively stable cognitive patterns which form the basis for the regularity of interpretations of a particular set of situations. Becks schemas are latent, i. e. nly activated or influenced by similar events to the ones that defined them. These schemas contain prepositional information (e. g. I am worthless). When focused on three interlocking beliefs in a negative way (the cognitive triad), this causes and maintains depression. The cognitive triad causes negative, automatic thoughts (i. e. depressive thoughts occurring beyond the conscious control of the sufferer) and to systematic or logical errors. Systematic errors are a variet y of errors of reasoning a depressive shows, which serve to perpetuate their depression. Examples include: over-generalisation, which is arbitrarily drawing a conclusion about a wide variety of things on the basis of single events (e. g. I failed my exam so I will fail in everything I do). Arbitrary inference is the drawing of a negative conclusion in the absence of supporting information (e. g. my friend did not want to meet me therefore she hates me). Dichotomous thinking describes thinking in polar opposites. So something is either all good or a total disaster, (e. g. if I fail this year at university I might as well be dead). Effectively, Beck defines the maintenance of depression as an interaction between all these factors causing a vicious cycle. See Figure 1. However, Becks theory has many criticisms. Beck argues that the cognitive triad is a stable trait that depressives develop; yet research shows that attributions fluctuate with mood. Beck sidesteps this problem by saying that the schemas are latent, but this is not an adequate solution. Additionally, Becks schemas are vaguely defined and therefore inadequate and he doesnt state how they are activated. Beck states that Depressogenic schemas are caused by a critical incident, so how do you account for depression that isnt caused by a critical incident? Most importantly, the evidence supporting Becks theory is correlational. So we know there is a strong association between negative thoughts and depression, but there is no evidence that it is causal. Therefore Becks theory is a good description of the cognitive symptoms of depression, but there is no evidence that it is anything more. This leads us to wonder how do cognitive theorists actually explain the aetiology of depression? Teasdales differential activation hypothesis (1988) was an extension of Becks work. He revised Bowers 1981 network theory for prepositional memory and made it into a cognitive theory of depression. The network is made up of links and nodes, each node either being a prepositional item or a depression emotion node termed DEMON. The more related two nodes are, the stronger the link. Past experience is the basis of these links and activation spreads passively through the network according to the strength of each link. A depressive tends to focus on the Demons, strengthening the links to them; thereby creating a viscous cycle that keeps on strengthening the links to the DEMONs. The Teasdale model is certainly a major theory that has stimulated a lot of research. A major strength of Teasdales theory is that it doesnt rely on identifying a critical incident whilst Becks does. This is due to the nature of the nodes and links in the network; therefore less related incidents can still trigger the demon. However, this theory again doesnt attempt to explain the aetiology by definition. Teasdale saw the maintenance of depression as cognitive, but not the cause. On a personal note, this theory seems rather abstract and scientific as a theory of an only too human mood disorder. It makes you wonder exactly how is depression caused according to cognitive theorists? However, cognitive therapy of depression is a rather different story from cognitive aetiology of the mood disorder. It has been widely accepted by the clinical community since it was introduced and cognitive therapy has generally being supported in controlled trials (Dobson, 1989). Cognitive therapy is based on the assertion that individuals can learn to recognise and modify their negative beliefs and maladaptive information processing capabilities, resulting in preventing or alleviating depression. Cognitive therapy has typically proven superior to no treatment or wait-list controls in college students (Shaw, 1977). Cognitive behaviour therapy is an active, directive, time-limited, structured approach . . . based on an underlying theoretical rationale that an individuals affect and behaviour are largely determined by the way in which he structures the world (Beck et al, 1979, p. ) Becks theory is described in a manual (Beck et al. , 1979). It is an individual approach with many individual decisions and therapist choices of techniques. The manual suggests a typical structure for the sequence of sessions. Specific cognitive techniques are used to provide entry points into the patients cognitive organization. The techniques of questioning, of identifying illogica l thinking are employed to help the patient and therapist to understand and modify the patients construction of reality. Findings do appear to provide impressive support for the efficacy of cognitive therapy in the treatment of depression. In 1977 Rush et al found cognitive therapy superior to imipramine pharmacotherapy in an outpatient sample. However, levels of depression actually increased for the pharmacologically treated patients during the 2 weeks before the end of treatment, when the medication was withdrawn. This increase could account for the pharmacotherapys poorer performance at post treatment. Moreover, Hollon et al (1991) suggests that cognitive therapy may prevent symptom return following successful treatment. Patients previously treated with cognitive therapy, either alone or in combination with medication, evidenced a lower rate of symptom return than patients treated with pharmacotherapy only. Rush, Khatami, and Beck (1975) reported the treatment of three patients with chronic depression using a combination of cognitive and behavioural techniques. The cognitive approach was directed at exposing and correcting the patients negative distortions of the activities undertaken. These patients showed rapid and persistent improvement with therapy as reflected by their scores on clinical and self-report measures. The three major cognitive theories in depression have been considered: Seligmans ( Abramsons revised) Learned Helplessness; Becks Cognitive distortion model and Teasdales Differential activation hypothesis. However, there are certain criticisms that apply to these models in general: the experimental samples used were mainly college students; the models are so general that they can apply equally well to anorexics, alcoholics etc and are therefore not very specific to depression. Most of the terms used are vaguely defined, leaving many processes and organisations unexplained. However, cognitive theories of depression generally suggest that mistaken beliefs and maladaptive information processing play a role in the onset and maintenance of depression (Beck, 1976). On the other hand, cognitive therapies based on Becks (1976) model are usually the therapy of choice by practitioners, especially in cases of mild to moderate depression. Therefore although cognitive theory may not be adequate to explain the aetiology of depression it is sufficient as a treatment for depression. Looking to the future, new theories need to take a broader view and begin to model the interaction between biological, environmental, and physiological factors. Although the cognitive idea of aetiology of depression is hazy, the treatment they suggest for the disorder clearly works yet more work needs to be done before cognitive therapy can be regarded as a preventative of depression and supported empirically.

Interview essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Interview - Essay Example The little musical device doesn’t just help him relax but also helps him become more focused when he is indulging in athletic activities such as boxing or training at the gym. Eric has owned the iPod for over three year now and no matter how old it gets he continues to cherish the music player he received as a Christmas present. It was in a way a tool to fit in with his peers better as he only wanted it because all his friends had iPods too. Eric hopes to become either a pharmacist or a doctor in the future. At the moment Front Range is a choice he has made for general study. He enrolled at Front Range because it is close to his home and the cost of classes is quite low. In order to pay for his classes he also works at Target. His hobbies further define his personality i.e. he is mainly interested in physical activity based activities such as swimming, boxing, weight lifting, running and spending time with his friends. For the sake of fun he also took a trip to Alaska and Utah at one point. Eric would like to someday visit England or France. Since he is from Louisville, Colorado, he’s not used to big cities and does not appreciate them very much. Eric is more comfortable in places where he is able to feel connected to nature. He has a very curious nature and likes experiencing new

Thinking critically Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Thinking critically - Essay Example Being ethical does not mean that an individual has to come from a specific family or attend a certain school. Others feel that they are educated and thus have more ethics. This is due to attending a given school or coming from a certain family. However, this perception is wrong since one may have attended any school and still embrace the sense of being ethical. Possessing the knowledge of what ethics are and conforming to the principles of being ethical goes unnoticed. The society focuses on teaching the young people on right and wrong but do not focus on the essence ethics in once life. However, in schools, there are efforts made to teach students about ethics and ways to be an ethical person but it does not seem to have a lot of effect on our lives. This teaching does not seem to influence our lives since they are not well articulated in our minds. Therefore, this brings into spotlight numerous things that the societies have to put into consideration on focusing. This is due to the conviction that it is not necessarily that a person who have been taught the ethics be ethical, some of them know what it is but turn a deaf ear. The colleges are charged with moral obligation of assist students in the pursuit of being ethical people. Colleges are believed to be the final stage of learning the essence of ethics and being ethical. Therefore, there is the need of having a keen focus on the colleges to ensure that learners have acquired ample knowledge about ethics. Professors are charged with the responsibility of taking their students through acquiring knowledge about ethics. This is most importantly showing them where the knowledge is applied in real life situation. Ethics knowledge is integrated in various disciplines i.e. business, engineering and others. This ensures that the students are acquiring significant information that is going to be helpful in their carrier. Instructors for given courses

Position on the conroversial subject of poverty Essay

Position on the conroversial subject of poverty - Essay Example When a person lives in poverty he often does not have enough money to provide himself and his family with the basic human needs which include food, shelter, and medicine. The biggest victims of the poverty dilemma are children. Children are innocent by standards that are suffering. In a lot of countries across the world adults are exploiting children by forcing them to work. There are nearly 250 million children who are child laborers. The United States is not exempt from the war against poverty. There are nearly 44 million children on food stamps in the United States which accounts for 21% of the children population of the nation (Snyder, 2011). The high cost of living in the United States is one of the reasons a lot children and adults are living in poverty. The continents that are suffering the most from poverty are Africa and Asia. The overpopulation in Asia is one the reasons that this ethnic group is suffering so much from poverty. The root of the poverty problem is income disc repancy. The poorest 40 percent of the world’s population accounts for 5 percent of global income, while the richest 20 percent accounts for three-quarters of world income (Globalissues, 2013). Something has to be done in order to create a better balance of the global wealth. Another major issue associated with poverty is that the governments across the world do not have sufficient resources to help their citizens. The majority of the global wealth is in the hands of corporations. Approximately 40% of the global wealth is owned by a tightly-knit cluster of 147 entities (Doctorow, 2011). These companies along with the other millions of businesses across the world have to become more proactive in the fight against poverty. The United Nations has to step in and impose solutions that will effectively change the course of history in order to eradicate poverty forever. A potential solution that the U.N. can implement is to create a special tax with the purpose of using that money s olely to provide financial aid to poor people in need. The tax would be imposed on corporations whose annual net income surpasses $1 million per year. Corporations that move millions of dollars can afford to pay that special tax without hurting the financial performance of the firm or adversely affecting its shareholders. The special tax to be imposed by the U.N should be 2.5% of net income. There has to be a better coordinated effort in order to fight poverty worldwide. A lot of nonprofit organizations such as Feed the Children are doing a wonderful job of fighting hunger and poverty worldwide. A group of consortiums must be establish in which the leaders of non-profit organizations in different countries meet at least once a month in order to discuss the efforts of each entity so that better coordination can be establish by these entities. Every citizen in the world must become more actively involved in this tough battle. Donating $10 a month by people that are part of the middle class would make a huge difference in the lives of poor people. The fight against poverty is an issue that affects everyone. Any person that is working can fall on hard times if they lose their job and poverty can become a reality for them. Entrepreneurs must keep applying innovation in order to create new jobs that will help poor people get out of poverty. The proposed special 2.5% by the U.N. is a major tactic that would have a huge impact in helping eradicate

Premarital Sex And Promiscuity

Premarital Sex And Promiscuity This essay will be discussing the topic of promiscuity and premarital sex from both Ellistons and Punzos theories. According to Punzo on Premarital sex, it is for two people to have engaged in a sexual contact/intercourse without having the full commitment but on the other hand, promiscuity according to Elliston it is to have sex with many different people without having any commitment. When comparing both, Punzo is seen as the conservative while Elliston is seen as supporting casual sex. Punzos theory is when two people are together having sex they both must be engaged in a deep commitment between the two people. On the other hand, Elliston is arguing that sexual intercourse doesnt require any thoughts or strong consideration with any commitments since it is not that big of a deal. According to Elliston promiscuity is seen as free love, where you can just meet someone and starting to fall in love with them. With this definition, it might be easier for some to understand it, as having freedom. It can also be recognized as having recreational sex, having sex just for fun. When the word fun comes with anything, it will be seen as attractive and easy going. Elliston has created a definition himself that better defined promiscuity. Promiscuity is defined as sex with a series of other adults not directly related through marriage and with no commitments; no promises of affection, sexual exclusivity in future (Elliston 144). Elliston also stated that for those who just want to get others in bed to have sex by lying, exploiting, and deceiving or something close to it are wrong. It is seen as wrong because it breaches the ethical principles that we all learned as a child, which is not to lie. When someone is lying about everything just because they are trying to get someone in bed to have sex with them, it is seen as very unethical. Promiscuity is seen as to the advantage of males and to the disadvantage of females because it is true that males do not have anything to lose while females will lose their virginity and at times their love. It has become exploitive; woman would get social blame but man would get sexual satisfaction. Promiscuity is not actually wrong but it is the double standard that is in places where woman is at a disadvantage in comparison to man. Promiscuity can not be defined as wrong all the time; the charges that it necessarily violates generally accepted a moral principle is false. (El liston 146). Elliston is saying that the double standard that should be remove but not the promiscuity, since it is always seen as a disadvantage for woman. The female involved might not feel the same as to being cheated or being used for the man to have their sexual satisfaction but it might be the woman who is using the man to satisfy herself. Sex is just a body language in the form of body interaction between the two people that are willing to interact and it leads to pleasure. It also has a deep meaning behind it. According o Elliston, sex is more than thrusts and moans, caresses and sighsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦just as verbal language has a dimension of meaning beyond phonemes and morphemes, so body language has a significance beyond the intertwining of two bodiesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Promiscuity has instrumental value in that it can facilitate the mastery of one kind of body languageà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦sexual body language is learned through sexual interactionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦experiences enable an individual to develop a repertoire of gestures for communicating desire and affection and of decisive movements that clearly state intentions of love or amusement. People can be moved not only by the things we say but also by the things we do-with them, for them, or to themà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦desire and satisfaction can be communicated not only through verbal exchanges, but also through a lingering look and an appreciative caress. To a shattered ego a physical embrace may express far more reassurance than its verbal counterparts, and a kiss may convey desire more eloquently than pleas or poemsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦The observance of this etiquette is an acknowledgement of the selfhood of the other. The acquisition of it is one of the opportunities promiscuity provides(Elliston 149). Based on this quote, Elliston is saying sex is a part of body language and the more you practice it the better you will get. The skills that you get from promiscuity will wider range of people outside of marriage or committed-relationships. Usually a married couple would be seen as only one man is allow to have dinner with one woman, which is referring to only having sex with the partner and that is it, third party is not acceptable (traditionally). Elliston sees having sex with one person at first before you decide to love that person or not. Pretty much he i s saying having sex first will be a pre-stage of trying out whether the persons sexual skill or chemistry from sexual intercourse will help you decide to love this person or not. Therefore Elliston is arguing that promiscuity should be allow and should not be seen as wrong because it is something for the two to try out and see if the chemistry is there. In Punzos view, sex before marriage or even having sex with no commitment is seen as wrong. Punzo has answered the question of is having pre-martial sex without any commitment wrong, with using Wilsons theory of sexual intercourse to compare it with playing tennis and Chessers theory of two people going to see movies together. Both Wilson and Chesser see it normal and there is nothing morally wrong about having pre-marital sex. At the same time, Punzo has disagreed with both of them stating that going to the movies or playing tennis with many people are just some general activities which anyone can encounter, but it does not necessary have to be the one you would have sex with, or have any sexual interest with. In Punzos view, sexual intercourse must be between two committed people, so having sex without any sort of commitment is wrong. Punzo states that commitment is a must before sex, as one must agree to commit to a relationship before they can move on to a new level in their rela tionship, through having sex, the two gives themselves to each other in the way of trust, expressing ones mind, and feelings through the most intimate activity, sexual intercourse. Punzo see Ellistons argument between sex and dinning is a wrong example because dinning and sex are two different things, it is in an extreme that it has nothing to do with each other, dinning and sex has no connection at all. Dinning can be with any friends, or family members, and it does not involve any sexual contacts. Yes, dining can be with your spouse, partner but it can also be with someone else. Both eating and sex do give people satisfaction, but they are totally different from each other. Food is a need for people to survive but people can live with out sex. Ellistons theory is to have sexual intercourse with as many people as you can before falling in love, but Punzos theory is to be in love or have the necessary commitment before having sexual intercourse. The moral perspectives of both are totally different from each other. This is why Punzo would not agree with Elliston and vice versa. Ellistons argument has a defect to it, it is having sex with a number of people does not only increase the skills of ones sexual ability, but it also limits the important value of having the most intimate relationship with the other through sexual intercourse. I believe we all know that having sex with the one we love is the most loving and special feeling of being complete as a whole. If one is engaged in a sexual activity with many other people and then stated that the one is now in love with their partner is not a rational theory, but it is also very confusing and unreasonable that promiscuity does not damage a committed relationship. Having sex without any commitment, and isolate oneself with uncommitted sex is a view that may not be true. They can have sex without any commitment but they might realize more about themselves. It doesnt mean they are isolating themselves just because they do not involve in a committed relationship. Punzos full commitment does not have a clear defin ition, does it mean to be in a legal marriage with legal documents, and so if the two are just common-law couple then does that mean they are not legal? Punzo should have clear that term and have a better explanation of it. With the mutual understanding and respects towards each other with pre-martial sex, it is not going to affect the two negatively. It would not be harm if pre-martial sex will lead the two into commitment and onto future commitment, it would become a good thing. If pre-martial sex is happening then protection is needed to prevent any unexpected or unwanted pregnancy. In conclusion, both Punzo and Elliston has their pros and cons. Premarital sex should follow Punzos theory of sex, and they must involve commitment, but not with full commitment. Punzo did not clarify what full commitment means, if it meant at the stage of being legally married, then those who are only engaged or soon to be marry couples should not be having any sexual interactions. Also promiscuity must be permitted only if no one is being hurt and lie to as a result of promiscuity. It is true that Ellistons argument of double standard needs to be remove because it is only seen as woman being the one that are at a disadvantage, but sometimes it is not the case, woman would be out to lie to man just to get money or any material that need from the man. Therefore double standard should be remove but not promiscuity. Also promiscuity is a good way to practice ones sexual skills and ability in the bed, it is true to the term practice makes prefect, it would suit this practice of promiscu ity closely.

Influenza in New York City :: Journalism Media Studies Influenza Health Essays

Influenza in New York City NEW YORK--The Influenza epidemic arrived in the city last month, and it has remained a constant presence since then. The epidemic, which is now present in most major cities in America, lingers in and around the city, affecting everyone. Dr. Copeland, Health Commissioner Royal, has declared influenza to be a reportable disease. Influenza presents itself in a manner not unlike a cold: runny nose, chills, fever, coughing, sneezing. Influenza is a stronger version of the cold, as it can lead to extreme pain and congestion, and, as we have seen, it can often result in death. Because influenza is so much like the cold, doctors urge all New Yorkers to suspect and prepare for influenza first when these symptoms arise. For their part, city officials have outlawed sneezing, coughing, and spitting in public. Doctors say the disease is spread through expelled mucus and saliva. It is expected that the new municipal codes will help to slow the spread of the disease. While the precautions strike many as odd and unnecessary, doctors insist that being more careful about our fluids will end the epidemic in the city sooner rather than later. Transgressors, along with receiving the disdain of the public, will be fined arrested and fined. Doctors and City officials alike insist that everyone cooperate to contain this disease. City-dwellers will also notice new opening and closing times for bars, restaurants, shops, theaters, businesses, and factories. The Board of Health has begun to regulate hours in order to reduce crowds. Doctors say that smaller crowds of people reduce the chance of the disease being spread. New Yorkers won't be stuck in large crowds of people which may or may not contain sick people. A few Board of Health officials anonymously and jokingly point out that for the first time in modern ages, New Yorkers will enjoy serenity and space when they go into the city. Even when sick people are out and about, smaller crowds will reduce the number of people exposed to the germs. New York remains a large, crowded city even with the restrictions, but Board of Health officials assert that even a small reduction in the number of people will lend to the fight against influenza. City officials are also monitoring travelers, keeping the sick off of trains, buses, and subways.