Critique

Running head : CRITIQUE[Author s Name][Tutor s Name][Class]AbstractThe choose of memories and the impact of external factors on memories require everlasting(a) choice of explore and analytical methods . In the desire to investigate subjective ideas , the researcher risks producing biased and unreliable research resultsThe subjectivity of truth and the subjectivity of memories were the subjects of various philosophic , physiological , and psychological studies . The researchers were establishing to prove the subjectivity of memories and the authenticity of noncurrent truths , but it seems that the problem of subjective narration and individualized variant of wizard s memories will forever remain a scientific and philosophical puzzleIn their research , Ochs and Capps (1997 ) are trying to prevail us closer to understanding t he sources of our memories , and the reasons for which we distort or turn conquer to verifiablely interpret memories . However , the work of Ochs and Capps (1997 ) seems to be deprive of some(prenominal) logical line , and is presented in the form of weaken concrete life examples , which contribute hardly be united to one subject Remembering is subjective event (Ochs Capps , 1997 , and it is catchy to repugn this statement , yet it is doubtful that the researchers have chosen an set aside method to prove it . First of all , the researchers do non go away objective situational discipline about the sources of real life examples they phthisis in their work as a result , these examples cannot turn in applicable conclusions on the subject of the research .

For example , the colloquy between a child and his beat at the dinner party table is highly biased , and we can interpret it in many ways : the father power have checkup problems with his memory or he qualification be entirely playing with the child . Second , Ochs and Capps (1997 ) try to support their shew with the results of anterior studies , but they do not evaluate objective situational data and the circumstances in which the cited dialog took place . As a result the information from previous studies is almost undesirable to the real life examples which the authors used in their researchThe choice of coiffe qualitative methods is the basis for making any research relevant and objective . The lack of critical information makes the results of any study biased and unreliable . Moreover , the results of much(prenominal) researches can hardly be used in push similar investigations and require thorough re-consideration before they are interpreted as the basis for futurity researchReferencesOchs , E Capps , L (1997 . report authenticity . Journal of memorial and Life History , 7 (1-4 , pp . 83-89PAGEPAGE 3 ...If you want to stick out a full essay, monastic order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper