Let the Punishment Fit the Crime Essay

If you cant do the measure dont do the offense or how about let the penalty fit the crime. These two statements have been near for years. If someone commits a crime they should be punish but to what extent? Should mistakable crimes be dealt with the same? Such as if a person had a refined amount of marijuana for personal employ in a car at crop, or they had an ounce of marijuana in their vehicle in a school zone. Should the legality treat these incidents the same? Or should they treat these cases differently? Some flock believe you should be censure to a authorization jail term no matter what crime you commit.They feel this pull up stakes deter people from committing crimes. Others feel criminals be doing too much clipping for in the main none violent criminal activity which put a strain on entire communities. This debate has been brewing for years. ar mandatory minimum sentences doing more scathe than good? The movement to establish mandatory minimum sentences for drug related offenses began in the early 1950s and gained momentum in the early 1970s (Carrillo, 2000). At this time the judge had the discretion of giving the suspect a mandatory sentence or a more lenient sentence. In 1986 the law was changed were as the judge at sea the power to make a woof in the length of a sentence he or she could impose on an offender.They had to follow strict sentencing guidelines which some settle was even oppose to. The main cerebrate for the mandatory minimum sentences during the earlier stages in the game was due to the growing drug dole out. This was a losing effort by law enforcement to stop the trafficking of drugs into the United States. In the look of many this obviously didnt work. As time went on the drug trade became bigger and better with more forward-looking technics and more potent drugs.